S. Carolina Supreme Court: Non-attorneys can modify home loans

CoreLogic: September completes 41,000 foreclosures IRVINE, Calif. – CoreLogic, a leading residential property information, analytics and services provider, released its September National Foreclosure Report which provides data on completed U.S..

The South Carolina Supreme Court has issued an administrative order making it clear that the foreclosure attorney is the point of contact once litigation begins-and rightly so. In the past, the foreclosure attorney would refer the homeowner to the lender, and the lender would refer the homeowner to the foreclosure attorney ("I’m sorry.

North Carolina’s top court: Legislators can confirm Cabinet RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) – North Carolina’s highest court has upheld a law subjecting the governor’s choices to run his top agencies to.

U.S. district judge richard Gergel, ruling in the case of a same-sex couple from Charleston who sued to be married, found South Carolina’s state constitutional ban "invalid as a matter of law."

The Supreme Court, however, rejected this argument, holding that mortgage lenders and servicers may modify mortgage loans absent supervision from a South Carolina-licensed attorney. The Court.

Helpful resources for South Carolina lawyers such as practice management advice, ethics opinions, legal research, CLE programming and a member directory, as well as information for the public on common legal topics.

This may have been an uncommon exercise of congressional power, as South Carolina contends, but the Court has recognized that exceptional conditions can justify legislative measures not otherwise appropriate. See Home. Page 383 U. S. 335. Bldg. & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell, 290 U. S. 398; Wilson v. New, 243 U. S. 332. Congress knew that some of.

Under this ruling, a loan modification conducted by a non-attorney does not constitute the unauthorized practice of law. This petition was filed as a result of the south carolina supreme court’s original and subsequent substitute opinion in Matrix Financial Services Corporation v. Frazer.

Court of Appeals reverses custody modification based on. – In the May 30, 2012 opinion in Tillman v.Oakes, 398 S.C. 245, 728 S.E.2d 45 (Ct. App. 2012), the South Carolina Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the family court’s custody modification because the family court made inadequate factual findings to justify a substantial change of circumstances.

Treasury relaxes rules to free-up HAFA short sales But today the treasury select committee makes it clear that an urgent lifeline must be thrown to those hurt by QE. It also highlights the plight of savers since the Bank cut the base rate to a.

Alimony in South Carolina – CONTACT A SOUTH CAROLINA DIVORCE ATTORNEY. Alimony is one of the most contentious issues in a South Carolina divorce. Your best resource is a South Carolina divorce attorney that is familiar with the Family Court judges in your area and can advise you on what to expect if you let a judge decide how much and for how long you will pay spousal support to your ex spouse.

Primed for Trouble: Pace of Mortgage Distress Shifts to Prime Borrowers Today private borrowers are again. government securities remain a prime investment, and the government still borrows at lower interest rates than any other lender. Can the federal government borrow.